Categorized | Commentary/Editorial

John Hayward: The Paul Revere Trap





John Hayward, formerly Doctor Zero, has some fun at the expense of hapless liberals over the recent Paul Revere kerfuffle in a piece today at Human Events:

Sarah Palin is generally a forthright individual, judged by either absolute standards, or the sliding scale applied to politicians.  That’s why recent evidence of devious behavior on her part is so disturbing.

I can believe she was thinking only of her intended audience when she told the Tea Party to “party like it’s 1773.”  Of course liberals have no idea when the original Tea Party occurred, and raced to demonstrate their deplorable ignorance of history by attacking her for saying it.  She didn’t know they were going to make fools of themselves.  She was thinking about the Tea Party enthusiasts she was speaking to, not ignorant lefty bloggers and talking heads.

But this time… this time was on purpose.  She knew exactly what she was doing when she said Paul Revere “warned the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms by ringing those bells, and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that were going to be secure, and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed.”

She knew that lefty bloggers and media talking heads would walk right into it.  She knew they are as ignorant of the Revolution as they were of the Tea Party, and remember nothing about Paul Revere except “one if by land, two if by sea.”  She knew damn well they wouldn’t be able to resist the opportunity to stick their noses in the air and arrogantly inform their audiences that she needs to go back to school and take high-school history over again.

I believe Hayward may very well be correct here.  Think about it.  Governor Palin was up in New England last week touring these historical sites.  Whenever I tour historical sites, the guides, usually park rangers, have their prepared narratives about the sites I’m visiting.  They will often sprinkle their scripted presentation with little nuggets and anecdotes that are not particularly well known, and which often deviate from conventional wisdom.  I admit that I didn’t know much about Paul Revere other than a vague recollection from grade school that he took a ride on his horse one night to warn the Colonists that ”the British are coming, the British are coming”.   As it turns out, this was historically incorrect, and Revere’s adventures were significantly distorted decades after his death by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in his now famous poem. 

This, in my experience, is exactly the kind of little known tidbit of information one would receive from guides when touring historical sites.  For that reason, I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility that Governor Palin, upon hearing this from a guide last week, mischievously endeavored to set up a trap not unlike the one liberals fell into when she told Tea Partiers to “party like it’s 1773”, as Hayward suggests.  I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but having followed Governor Palin and her sense of humor for nearly three years now, this seems more than plausible, even likely.   She’s essentially toying with them like a cat toying with a recently caught mouse.  The funniest part is many of them still don’t realize it.  Read Hayward’s entire piece here.

(h/t Josh Painter)



Tags: , , ,
  • Anonymous

    I was thinking a bit more about the MSM’s deliberate distortion of some of the transcriptions of SP’s extemporaneous (?) remarks — by means of omitting or otherwise tinkering with the punctuation — and the quotation above might be a case in point. Consider the difference that a few commas and an apostrophe or two can make:

    Paul Revere “warned the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms by ringing those bells, and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that were going to be secure, and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed.”

    Now with some minor alteration in the transcription. Paul Revere “warned the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms, by ringing those bells, and making sure, as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells, that we’re going to be secure, and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed.”

    Isn’t this a fair criticism of media malfeasance?

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • MaMcGriz

      It most assuredly is, Am-pat.

      It most assuredly is. And I’m glad to see the term malfeasance used in this context, because that’s exactly what it is. Willful malfeasance. 

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Absolutely, although it is possible none of them know how  to write grammatically correct sentences.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Absolutely, although it is possible none of them know how  to write grammatically correct sentences.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was talking in broken sentences, …. (dot, dot dot) or , (commas) are needed and not treated like one big sentence

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was talking in broken sentences, …. (dot, dot dot) or , (commas) are needed and not treated like one big sentence

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was talking in broken sentences, …. (dot, dot dot) or , (commas) are needed and not treated like one big sentence

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        Sarah is held to impossibly high standards.  What’s so incredible to me is after the inevitable, idiotic LSM brouhaha erupts, she’s almost always right!  She must have a fierce intelligence!!

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was talking in broken sentences, …. (dot, dot dot) or , (commas) are needed and not treated like one big sentence

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was talking in broken sentences, …. (dot, dot dot) or , (commas) are needed and not treated like one big sentence

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    Simply put, the Governor is brilliant!  The LSM has tried to destroy her and her family and those attempts have only made them stronger.  Now the LSM is all wee-wee’d up (my apologies to the cry-baby, roadside pit-stop reporter for use of the term) about her accurate, yes accurate, description of Paul Revere’s ride.  Again, the woman is brilliant!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Norton/100002228997007 John Norton

    It is and they do it  all the time unless someone calls them out for their misrepresentations…..Other news  Breitbart was just on the news,;he took over the mic with press there on the anthony weiner thing.See hannity show today second hour…

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IDAKYMXLZIRLMLGEZJXV3AOO7E Vorlath

    I don’t think she did it on purpose. Everything she says is analyzed for gotchas. I think this was a subject that a lot of people weren’t fully aware, and so the Leftist media knew that their audience wouldn’t be either and they used it.

    It may actually be the other way around. I don’t think Sarah Palin realized just how stupid the Left really was.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      I think she knows, she just doesn’t care.  They’re such losers.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    I agree. I sited the 1773 example in an earlier post and asked if any of us believed that Sarah would go on the American history tour without all the facts well studied. Especially after Michelle B.’s Concord and Lexington comments a month ago. if they do, they don’t know Sarah Palin!

    My thought was that she used this example to  HIGHLIGHT the 2nd amendent, a citizen militia, armed to protect their freedom. She may not have know they would bite at the bait, but she could get the 2nd amendent info out there. Did you see how all the school kids loved her?

    Again, Sarah bring to the the attention of thinking Americans to go back and relearn their american history.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LACMLYUZW57YUC7IID2Z4YT4NY DSB

    Whoa…sweet apologia.  While Gov. Palin takes a lot of abuse from the media, there’s no way an honest reading of what she said can lead you to believe that this was not simply a word salad that didn’t quite get across what she heard on a tour.  She certainly did not construct this interpretation in her head beforehand.

    It’s my opinion, but it’s an opinion backed up by a few decades of studying and teaching history.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Word salad is code word for troll.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Word salad is code word for troll.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      After having to eat crow this morning, the left is now complaining that she needs to speak clearer, i.e. how dare she get into the weeds on Paul Revere history; all we know is the 6th grade poems.

      They are so pathetic.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      You got it right.  Word salad it is.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      You got it right.  Word salad it is.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was proven right, troll salad.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    At Fox Nation: “New Palin Film, ‘The Undefeated,’ Getting Rave Reviews”
    http://nation.foxnews.com/sara...

    and “Experts: Palin Is Right About Paul Revere”
    http://nation.foxnews.com/sarah-palin/2011/06/06/experts-palin-right-about-paul-revere

    Let’s support her there. At least “Fire It Up.”

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    At Fox Nation: “New Palin Film, ‘The Undefeated,’ Getting Rave Reviews”
    http://nation.foxnews.com/sara...

    and “Experts: Palin Is Right About Paul Revere”
    http://nation.foxnews.com/sarah-palin/2011/06/06/experts-palin-right-about-paul-revere

    Let’s support her there. At least “Fire It Up.”

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • blackbird

      At Fox Nation: “New Palin Film, ‘The Undefeated,’ Getting Rave Reviews”
      http://nation.foxnews.com/sarah-palin/2011/06/06/new-palin-film-undefeated-getting-rave-reviews

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • blackbird

      At Fox Nation: “New Palin Film, ‘The Undefeated,’ Getting Rave Reviews”
      http://nation.foxnews.com/sarah-palin/2011/06/06/new-palin-film-undefeated-getting-rave-reviews

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        techno’s theory is that it may be a trap.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
        • blackbird

          Hi Gelston, had read techno’s post, yes I agree with techno here, how can you “scare the ‘living daylights’ out of Americans” if the person you are warning about is unelectable by your own admission, does not make any sense, I agree, its a trap.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
        • Anonymous

          Jedediah Bila’s comments are featured, so who is trapping whom?

          Let’s support Governor Palin at the posts about her at Fox Nation.  This is one web site that tends to be fair with her.  We can at least “Fire It Up” with all of their posts about her.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      shocker….even BOR backs up tPalin on this

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      shocker….even BOR backs up tPalin on this

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        I suspect that BOR has been catching “heat” for slamming Palin each night. 
        Additionally, it has become quite embarrassing that Palin has not been on his
        little show after the last dustup where she had to chatise him for interrupting her.

        He is doing his penance. 

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
        • Anonymous

          Billo’s stupid guest, Bernie Goldman,  got it wrong.  So freaking tedious to listen to these know it alls who know nothing.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
          • Anonymous

            –Goldberg–  who cares

            Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • http://twitter.com/politics_blog PoliticalWorldView

    U.N. FACING LENGTHY BAN http://www.politicalworldview.com/2011/06/united-nations-facing-lengthy-ban.html

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Mr_Wednesday_Night

      If you’re not selling Lace Wigs, I’m not interested.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Mr_Wednesday_Night

      If you’re not selling Lace Wigs, I’m not interested.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        You must be from AOSHQ. :)

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        You must be from AOSHQ. :)

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • http://twitter.com/politics_blog PoliticalWorldView

    U.N. FACING LENGTHY BAN http://www.politicalworldview.com/2011/06/united-nations-facing-lengthy-ban.html

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    I thought that Governor Palin had set the media up early this morning in a post. ” I think Governor Palin’s suckered the media into her ‘Paul Revere’
    stratagem, by doing a wide-eyed expression as if she was guessing.”
    I’m ready to play poker face a game of 5 card…NOT!!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    I thought that Governor Palin had set the media up early this morning in a post. ” I think Governor Palin’s suckered the media into her ‘Paul Revere’
    stratagem, by doing a wide-eyed expression as if she was guessing.”
    I’m ready to play poker face a game of 5 card…NOT!!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    Wonder if he saw my post from last night. Hmmm….
    ——————————-
    You can tell that the professor isn’t a hunter or he would know about
    traps.  When Gov. Palin says something that is obviously false (using a
    third grader’s knowledge and skills) you can bet it’s a trap.  It draws
    the fire of the unsuspecting prey and then the trap springs ensnaring
    the hapless victim with the truth of Gov. Palin’s statement and
    resounding in the media for several news cycles.  The victim is then
    forced to face the reality that the person whom he has called stupid and
    ignorant has outsmarted him. 

    What does this accomplish if it
    initially makes Gov. Palin look stupid?  First, she doesn’t care about
    what a bunch of liberals think.  Second, it thins the herd of the most
    blatant Palin haters.  Third, the resolution embarrasses the victim and
    reinforces that Gov. Palin knows more than they do.  Fourth, it gives
    the media more Palin columns. and Fifth, it can shine a light on a
    subject the Governor wants discussed more in the media.

    Plus the technique is humane.  The victim gets eaten and doesn’t even know he’s been trapped.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • MaMcGriz

      I saw this last night. I’m glad you re-posted it here.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • MaMcGriz

      I saw this last night. I’m glad you re-posted it here.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • MaMcGriz

      I saw this last night. I’m glad you re-posted it here.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      SNAP……..
      screach….click…..
      Reset…wait for it
      SNAP

      Sarah’s mouse trap workin hard

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      SNAP……..
      screach….click…..
      Reset…wait for it
      SNAP

      Sarah’s mouse trap workin hard

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      SNAP……..
      screach….click…..
      Reset…wait for it
      SNAP

      Sarah’s mouse trap workin hard

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Great comment I didn’t see it last night. It thins the herd, and it makes the surviving three legged mutts more cautious. :~)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    Wonder if he saw my post from last night. Hmmm….
    ——————————-
    You can tell that the professor isn’t a hunter or he would know about
    traps.  When Gov. Palin says something that is obviously false (using a
    third grader’s knowledge and skills) you can bet it’s a trap.  It draws
    the fire of the unsuspecting prey and then the trap springs ensnaring
    the hapless victim with the truth of Gov. Palin’s statement and
    resounding in the media for several news cycles.  The victim is then
    forced to face the reality that the person whom he has called stupid and
    ignorant has outsmarted him. 

    What does this accomplish if it
    initially makes Gov. Palin look stupid?  First, she doesn’t care about
    what a bunch of liberals think.  Second, it thins the herd of the most
    blatant Palin haters.  Third, the resolution embarrasses the victim and
    reinforces that Gov. Palin knows more than they do.  Fourth, it gives
    the media more Palin columns. and Fifth, it can shine a light on a
    subject the Governor wants discussed more in the media.

    Plus the technique is humane.  The victim gets eaten and doesn’t even know he’s been trapped.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    Sarah Palin is alot smarter than the leftest media think she is, or that they know she is smart and thats why they fear her. I read about Michelle Bachmann hiring Ed Rollins for a campaign manager. I don’t know what she was thinking, Ed Rollins is horrible to say the least and he is such a insider, I think Michelle Bachmann hurt herself big time with this. Ed Rollins does not represent Tea Party Values.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      I”m inclined to believe that some one hired Rollins for her. Perhaps the person who hired her as stalking horse. I don’t believe that she would be inclined to hire him on her own. This says that she is no longer a Tea party candidate. This actually is good for The Governor.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      I”m inclined to believe that some one hired Rollins for her. Perhaps the person who hired her as stalking horse. I don’t believe that she would be inclined to hire him on her own. This says that she is no longer a Tea party candidate. This actually is good for The Governor.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mrl-Tav/100001255710931 Mrl Tav

    you know we think very much alike. I just posted a new media vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgOuBmh9B6k and I said the same thing.  Think about the time when she wrote on her hand. that was a planned move. the woman is shrewd. she’s setting up mine fields for the media. sssssssssssssshhhh, maybe we should be keeping that a secret. :) -Mr.L

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/danthebarbarian Daniel Morgan

      Thank you Mr. L, your youtube posts are great, now a loyal fan!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/danthebarbarian Daniel Morgan

      Thank you Mr. L, your youtube posts are great, now a loyal fan!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/danthebarbarian Daniel Morgan

      Thank you Mr. L, your youtube posts are great, now a loyal fan!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/danthebarbarian Daniel Morgan

      Thank you Mr. L, your youtube posts are great, now a loyal fan!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    One if by Land,
    Two if by Sea,
    Three if by BUS with a flag on the front!

    Sarah is Coming! Sarah is Coming! Sarah is Coming!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • N.A.C.

      IndieDogg 1  Nancy6 0
      LOL

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      DING DING DING!!!!
      WINNER-WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!!!!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • CVA9

    I loved that little coy smile she had when she said she knows her American history and when she said she didn’t intend to step on Mitt’s toes.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Sarah was too nice.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    I knew this was going to happen. The media is turning on a dime to draw in Sarah Palin. They are laying out a bear rug with a nice cup of hot coco.            

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
  • Anonymous

    IMO Hayward is giving her way too much credit here. She flubbed her initial response:  Revere didn’t fire any warning shots or ring any bells; he was riding in stealth and trying to avoid the British; and he certainly didn’t ride out with any INTENTION to warn the British about anything – that only happened because they captured him and threatened his life.  IMO she should have been humble enough to acknowledge the flub on FNS.

    Her explanation on FNS was more complete and clear, but it wouldn’t have been necessary had she not added her own ahistorical editorial touches (about Revere firing shots and ringing bells, etc.) in her original statement. 

    I think she just got caught up in the idea of the colonists’ plan to protect and keep their weapons, and took it a bit too far.  Everyone misspeaks once in a while, and when that happens it’s very human and humble to simply say, “I should have been more clear.”  There is no shame in admitting error, especially on something as insignificant as this.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/rae4palin rae4palin

      Do you live under a rock?  Do you like it?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/rae4palin rae4palin

      Do you live under a rock?  Do you like it?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://twitter.com/rae4palin rae4palin

      Do you live under a rock?  Do you like it?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1537873048 Nicole Olmstead Coulter

      I don’t think she said Paul Revere rang the bells or fired the shots. But yes indeed there WERE bells and shots, and apparently that spooked the British.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        Nicole, I was simply considering the plain meaning of her words in the order and grammatical construct she placed them in. I understand that is not what she MEANT to say, but that’s still the way it came out. (And yes, I know about the bells and shots, it’s just that neither of those were among Revere’s roles on his several rides that night.) Sorry to be such a contrarian — I’m an editor and a linguist, and to me language matters.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
        • Anonymous

          Well, we know you must hold EVERYONE to your lofty standards all of the time even when they’re speaking on the fly, right?  Right?  Of course you do; because we all know, “language matters.”  Yuck.

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1537873048 Nicole Olmstead Coulter

      I don’t think she said Paul Revere rang the bells or fired the shots. But yes indeed there WERE bells and shots, and apparently that spooked the British.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1537873048 Nicole Olmstead Coulter

      I don’t think she said Paul Revere rang the bells or fired the shots. But yes indeed there WERE bells and shots, and apparently that spooked the British.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      She didn’t say Revere rang bells or shot anything……That was already happening by the colonists and the British heard it.  Palin didn’t say anything wrong, it’s just people had a hard time understanding her sentence.  Just because people didn’t understand it, doesn’t mean she was wrong.  Why don’t you just say ” I didn’t understand what she said.”  There is nothing wrong with saying that.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
      • Anonymous

        Basic rules of grammar and sentence construction are not suspended just because Gov. Palin was caught off guard and didn’t take the half-second needed to compose a coherent response to the reporter’s question.

        Twice she said Revere was ringing bells (which he didn’t), in addition to saying that he fired warning shots (which he didn’t) and that he was riding to warn the British (which he wasn’t — he was caught by the British and forced at gunpoint to give information). 

        The fact that bells were rung and warning shots fired by others does not change the fact that Revere did not do either of those things. The fact that Revere ended up — under threat of death — telling the British that the colonials were ready and armed does not mean that he rode to warn the British.

        I understood exactly what she said in her initial statement, and it was simply wrong. One can certainly add or substract or rearrange words to make it right, but her actual words on tape were wrong.

        I also understood exactly what she MEANT to say, and on Fox News Sunday she finally said what she meant to say. But what she said on Sunday is not the same as what she said in her initial ill-considered statement. 

        To me it’s not a big deal that she flubbed it. She’s only human, she’d had an incredibly hectic week with thousands of questions flung at her from all sides for hours every day, she was looking after Piper in a strange place in the middle of a crowd of strangers, and she may not have even heard the question clearly. And it was obviously a stupid thing for the media to get all hung up about. 

        But it does bother me that she, and most folks here, are simply incapable of admitting that once in a while she’s going to make a hash of things (and much better that it be over something like this, that has absolutely no significance in the grand scheme of things). When that happens, why not just end it by saying, “Oops, I should have said that more clearly.” Why is acknowledging one tiny moment of non-clarity such a huge deal?

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
        • Anonymous

          Jeannie, you bother us, you imperious snot.  Please take a hint and go away–you are tedious to say the least.   You’re wrong, though, Sarah’s throw away line has been proven to be correct.
          ROFL!

          Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
          • Anonymous

            yeah, like I’m going to stop supporting Gov. Palin and writing e-mails and posts in her defense and volunteering and getting thousands of votes for her and helping her win the VA primary and the Presidency, all because you call me infantile names. 

            Dream on, socon. But do keep it up — maybe you’ll succeed in driving away some of her supporters and volunteers and votes, and then you can really feel good about yourself.

            Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      She didn’t say Revere rang bells or shot anything……That was already happening by the colonists and the British heard it.  Palin didn’t say anything wrong, it’s just people had a hard time understanding her sentence.  Just because people didn’t understand it, doesn’t mean she was wrong.  Why don’t you just say ” I didn’t understand what she said.”  There is nothing wrong with saying that.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote
    • Anonymous

      Palin was proven right, troll salad.  Nice try though, just not very original.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 Please Login/Register to vote

Open Thread

Readers’ Submissions

Governor Palin's Tweets