Categorized | Current Affairs

Romney Adopts Obama’s Position on Global Warming; Updated: Video Added





Mitt Romney is already simpatico with the Obama Administration on cap and trade, ethanol subsidies, and health care mandates.  Today we can add one more to the list: Man-made global warming, via Reuters:

“I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that,” he told a crowd of about 200 at a town hall meeting in Manchester, New Hampshire.

Remind me again: Why is this guy considered the frontrunner for the Republican nomination?  I may be going out on a limb here, but shouldn’t the Republican candidate oppose Democrat positions?  Or am I living in the past and hopelessly naive?  If so, why waste so much time and money on these messy election thingies when we can simply adopt a one-party system such as that in China?  A logical first step would be to take the Wall Street Journal’s advice and replace Joe Biden with Mitt Romney as Obama’s running mate.

Update: (h/t Jim R) This is interesting.  Jedediah Bila tweets:

Mitt Romney: “Oil is purported to be one of the primary contributors to rising global temperatures. If, in fact, global warming is importantly caused by our energy appetite, it’s yet one more reason for going on an energy diet. As we have seen, it is hardly the only reason for doing so.” (No Apology, page 227)

Since I wasn’t one of the few who read Mitt’s book, I was unaware that he’s totally bought into the man-made global warming hoax. So much so that he’s gone beyond cap and trade to adopt Al Gore’s position of purposely lowering our living standards by “going on an energy diet”.

Update II: Video via Hot Air:



Tags: , ,

Comment Policy: The Editors reserve the right to delete any comments which in their sole discretion are deemed false or misleading, profane, pornographic, defamatory, harassment, name calling, libelous, threatening, or otherwise inappropriate. Additionally, the Editors reserve the right to ban any registered poster who, in their sole discretion, violates the terms of use. Do not post any information about yourself reasonably construed as private or confidential. Conservatives4Palin and its contributors are not liable if users allow others to contact them offsite.

  • Anonymous

    Romney has 2 major planks that will contradict and works against his platform policy position:
    1) Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGM) – How can Romney justify EPA green energy policy and sell bio-fuel policy to American public? Even Al Gore, the godfather of Anthropogenic Global Warming has now reversed his position on corn ethanol. Romney sounded very tentative and clueless on the economic reality of green renewable energy policy.

    2) RomneyCare – How can he oppose and repeal ObamaCare and yet justify his own RomneyCare?
    These two plank straw-man arguments won’t hold up to intense scrutiny in candidate policy debate and it’s going to come back to haunt him. Romney started his announcement on the wrong (left) foot focusing on the non-starter AGW and ethanol subsidies issues.

    The left media will use the global warming issue to grill and dismiss conservative candidates on the “settled science of AGW”.  Senator Infohofe’s position on the “The Hoax  of AGM”  before the House Energy and Commerce Committee is a good stance.

  • Anonymous

    Could someone post a link to information proving that global warming is a hoax, or at least not caused by people. I am not convinced either way, and I think some evidence might help.

    Also, above it says:
    Remind me again: Why is this guy considered the frontrunner for the Republican nomination?  I may be going out on a limb here, but shouldn’t the Republican candidate oppose Democrat positions?  Or am I living in the past and hopelessly naive? 

    That seems like a partisan and unreasonable idea. If democrats have a good idea, we should support it, and if we have a good idea, they should support us. This may be impossible because of political reasons, but it is foolish, and overly political, rather than intelligent, to challenge an idea simply because of who happens to say it. Any thoughts?

Open Thread

Our Sarah

Governor Palin's Tweets