I think I have been more than fair to the media and their polling.  I accept that Romney is a bit behind, but acknowledge that a number of polls have a higher Democratic margin than the turn out in 2008.  I think it is unfortunate that major media players would rather insult conservatives who take issue with that then explain why it is so and how they are arriving at their polling results.

I would note that there are a number of polls that show Romney a couple of points behind that have a more reasonable Democrat to Republican ratio.  But I wish the media would explain, instead of insult conservatives, why there is such a gap.  Last night on twitter, Chuck Todd was ridiculing people who believe there is a media conspiracy.  Meanwhile, his own network has dragged its feet on coverage of the administration’s disastrous handling of Libya and, well, he works for MSNBC.

Perhaps instead of being insulting, he, a former staffer for Tom Harkin’s Presidential campaign and whose wife was or is a Democratic operative, should acknowledge conservative distrust of the media and try to explain how the polls are shaped, skewed, weighted or not, and the general methodology.

Along the lines of the media’s seeming outright contempt for voters, conservatives, and news consumers in general, we should look no further this morning than yesterday’s media malpractice by the Washington Post, yet again involving poll data.

Several polls came out yesterday showing a tighter race than last week.  CNN has a three point gap.  Washington Post/ABC News has a two point gap.  The Battleground Poll (one of my personal favorites) has a two point gap.  In fact, all three polls have Romney at 47%.

More.