The name Bork has become a verb because he endured the first of the vicious, libelous, character-assassinating campaigns that have come to characterize judicial nominations and other contests in which liberals feel justified in “lying for justice.”
The passage of time has not diminished the outrage one feels on revisiting that campaign. Sen. Ted Kennedy, who had, through criminal negligence, caused the death of a young woman, warned the nation that Judge Bork was dangerous to women. The ACLU, People for the American Way and the Alliance for Justice, along with their compliant agents at the major networks, newspapers and magazines, floated a series of lies and distortions that left all standards of decency and fair play behind. Bork supported “literacy tests” for black voters. He opposed the teaching of evolution in schools; he favored the poll tax, opposed equal accommodations for black Americans, denied the principle of one-man/one-vote, would overturn 30 years of civil rights legislation, would prevent married couples from using contraception and supported mandatory sterilization of women in certain circumstances. Not a syllable was true.
Bork did support overturning Roe versus Wade — and that was probably the nub of it. If there was one thing liberals were determined to prevent, no matter what tactics were required. It was the free votes of Americans in their 50 states regulating abortion. No lie was too low for that sacred project.
Bork’s nomination was defeated. President Reagan might have saved it had he waded in more energetically. But he was still reeling after the Iran/Contra imbroglio and had retreated to his ranch during the thick of it.