Categorized | Headlines

Chris Stirewalt | No Mandate for Obama on Spending

There have been recent ratifying elections, 1996 and 1984, in which the  policies and approaches of an incumbent president have been given a big green  light. But in a binary political system, it is also possible to have voters  choose to retain an incumbent, but not ratify his policies.

Obama did win a mandate on the issue of tax increases on top earners. It was  part of his personal attacks on Romney and a core part of his campaign message.  Similarly, his predecessor won a broader, but still limited, mandate to continue  fighting the war in Iraq.

But Obama has already used his mandate, winning an increase in  tax rates on individuals making more than $400,000 per year. The taxes went  up and the proceeds were already spent on an aid package for victims of  Hurricane Sandy. So that’s that…

But on the core of Obama 2.0 — his call for more deficit spending to revive the  torpid economy and “invest” in the middle class – its clear that Obama hasn’t  got the juice.


Comment Policy: The Editors reserve the right to delete any comments which in their sole discretion are deemed false or misleading, profane, pornographic, defamatory, harassment, name calling, libelous, threatening, or otherwise inappropriate. Additionally, the Editors reserve the right to ban any registered poster who, in their sole discretion, violates the terms of use. Do not post any information about yourself reasonably construed as private or confidential. Conservatives4Palin and its contributors are not liable if users allow others to contact them offsite.

Open Thread

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content

Governor Palin’s Tweets

Sponsored Content