Maddow: Cruz and Palin should be charged with sedition or something; Updated: Dem Rep calls Tea Party “domestic enemies”

Heh:

I appeared on NPR on Wednesday and was surprised to hear a caller say that Sen. Ted Cruz should be charged with sedition. “I’m really baffled by the fact that the discussion has not ever reached the point where charges of sedition should be brought up against him for conspiring and bullying others to work with him to undermine the American economy … full faith and credit,” the caller said. “He’s done so much damage to the standing of the United States in the world. And if you read the Sedition Act, it seems like it really applies.”…

…it turns out that in a few corners of the left, there are activists who would like to see Cruz, along with other Republicans and conservatives who have expressed strong opposition to Obamacare, charged with inciting rebellion against the United States government.

After Cruz and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin appeared together last weekend on the National Mall, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow reported the event in front of a screen with pictures of Cruz and Palin and the title LATEST SEDITION. Maddow did not utter the word itself, but viewers certainly got the message.

On the activist website MoveOn.org, there are multiple petitions calling for Cruz and others to be charged with sedition. In one, the petition writer adopted a very broad and somewhat fuzzy standard under which Cruz should be sent to jail: “Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order,” the petition says. “Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Sedition is the stirring up of rebellion against the government in power.” Another petition adds “insurrection” to Cruz’s indictment.

That was Byron York at the Washington Examiner.  This typical idiocy from the left is absurd on too many levels to count, but let’s just look at a couple. First, do they actually want to criminalize policies that “undermine the economy”? Do they really want to go there? If so, can we start with Obamacare?  How about Obama’s doubling of the national debt?  How about wasting a trillion dollars on a stimulus that didn’t stimulate anything but unemployment? I could go on and on, but you get the picture. Second, wasn’t the 1st Amendment specifically written to guarantee citizens the right to political speech against the “established order”? So is peaceably assembling to question the government’s policies and priorities now akin to sedition in the Age of Obama.  That this is the textbook definition of Orwellian eludes Obama’s low-information followers utterly. Big surprise there. Not.

Update: Via Mediaite, more Orwellian nuttery from the loony left.  This time from a Democrat Congressman:

We take an oath to support the country against all enemies foreign and domestic, and these are the domestic enemies.

So anyone who opposes Hopenchange is a seditious domestic enemy.  Gotcha, champ.



(18853 Posts)

Leave a Reply